Kathryn Howard
I'm really passionate about service management - are you?
Profile
Summary
Accreditations
* ITIL Expert V3
* ITIL V3 Managing Across the Lifecycle
* ITIL V3 Intermediate: Service Strategy
* ITIL V3 Intermediate: Service Design
* ITIL V3 Intermediate: Service Transition
* ITIL V3 Intermediate: Service Operations
* ITIL V3 Intermediate: Continual Service Improvement
* ISO 20000 Foundation
* Cobit 4.1 Fundamentals
Associations
* ITSMF NSW branch chairperson and conference speaker 2010/11
* PACRIM Service Management conference return speaker 2008-2010
* VizThink online community member
During the last 10 years I have undertaken various roles and projects with the following organisations:
ASIC
Alphawest
AAPT
Securities Institute Australia
Macquarie Bank
I intend to continue building my ITIL skills through assisting medium to large organisations in their committment to onging process improvement and successful service delivery.
Experience
- May 2011 - PresentIT Service Management Consultant / ASIC
- May 2010 - PresentNSW Branch Chairperson / itSMF Australia
- 1998 - PresentIT Service Management Consultant / Visual ExplanationsInformation technology service delivery and service management consultancy services specialising in IT service strategy and governance. Clients includ public and private sector
- Jan 2010 - Dec 2010ITSM Consultant / Ajilon (Australia)
- Jan 2010 - Oct 2010IT Service Management Consultant / ASICProcess improvement consultation and workshop facilitation surrounding Incident, Problem and Change Management
- Sept 2008 - Dec 2008ITIL/ISO20000 Consultant / AlphawestProvision of subject matter expertise in ITIL v2, v3 and ISO20000 development of policy and process in preparation for ISO20000 accreditation specialisation in Continual Service Improvement and Control & Release (Change, Release, Configuration).
- Mar 2007 - Dec 2007Service Capability Manager Australia / AAPTSupport service management and project teams with appropriate tools,
analysis, reporting, planning, and process ownership. Management of service processes through establishment of business case to business-as-usual customer support. - Feb 2006 - Dec 2006Network Services Manager / HudsonManaging IT 1st-3rd level customer service for Austraia.
- 2002 - 2005IT Customer Service Manager / FINSIA - formerly Securities Institute AustraliaResponsible for all IT infrastructure service management and delivery
- 1995 - 2001Infrastructure Managment - various / Macquarie BankRoles included
Change Manager
Y2K Desktop Consultant
Manager Applications Licensing/Metering
and
Team Leaderships: Desktop Specialist Group, Desktop Design Team, Client Systems Integration - 1988 - 1995Desktop Support Team Leader / St. George BankResponsible for managing IT service desk and infrastructure improvement projects
- 1987 - 1988Desktop Support Specialist / AGC FinanceResponsible for 2nd level support delivery
- 1984 - 1987Desktop Support Specialist / Citec - Qld GovtFormerly known as State Govt Computer Centre (SGCC) - responsible for 1st/2nd level PC support for all state government ministerial offices.
Posts
Check out the video of the ITSMF Australia NSW Q2 2011 seminar.
We had FUN!
Today I was reminded by a smile and well-wishing for my evening, to document the "concierge who cares".
One of the concierge staff in my office building goes above and beyond the requirement of his job description.
Firstly, he's a lovely man who joyously greets the building workers at the beginning and end of every day. There was a gap of 6 months between my assignments in this building and he even remembered me as if I'd never left!
Apart from helping my vanity, how is he above and beyond?
The office building is directly next door to a major tourist attraction. There was, until recently, a considerable building construction zone. Identifying the tourist entry was difficult. I have observed him on several occasions directing tourists to the appropriate entry.
The other redirection he offers is more surprising. Prior the refurb of the building (2 years) a major public service department was housed here. Occasionally people wander in looking for the previous department. Our ever-friendly concierge has city maps, a highlighter pen, and redirects people to where they need to go to the relocated department.
The latter behaviour I've observed at least twice while waiting for a friend in the foyer.
I should also add, that this is in Australia - the concierge receives no tip for doing what he does.
An excellent display of great customer service!
We've talked much of late about BYOD (Bring Your Own Device) but how is it actually affecting the workplace?
As a consultant on-site with a govt department very watchful of what sites and apps are accessed on their corporate machines, I've been using the BYOD philosophy for some time. On my corporate machine I am not able to access webmail plus most blog sites etc. are blocked. I therefore have my netbook by my side with wifi modem for everything else.
So what's the problem? Well I'm OK, but a little conflicted and have a little extra overhead of emailing docs back/forth with 2 machines/accounts. But simply, it's got too hard for corporate IT to keep up with securing while providing the flexibility needed in today's business world. Added to this, technology in the home, at a user level, is now superior to technology in the workplace. Gen X accept, but Y feel disenfranchised by being forced to use technology that they perceive to be antiquated. I wonder what the next upcoming generation is going to think.
IT no longer has any control - it has to settle for manage.
Some corporates are seizing the day by making it a condition of employment to provide your own device and support it yourself (Suncorp and Jetstar). Personally I'm of 2 minds with this - it's reasonable for a labourer to bring their own tools, but when it comes to technology, there's technology and then there's "technology"! You require a level of quality, but when you put this extra onus on employees, how do you manage the quality?
I live in a city and only see young people who have good technology in excess. I'm concerned about those without - how can they even get an entry level job these days?I've complained about Australia Post before about failing to deliver parcels to my apartment. They've just lowered the bar.
I've a typical apartment letterbox which is too small for the postie to insert any parcel. A fact of inner city living.
I'm often working at home and my previous annoyance has been that said postie never attempts to buzz the apartment. Usually, they put a notice in the letterbox and run away.
It's at this point I often recall as a preschooler bounding to the garden gate to welcome our twice daily visiting, friendly, bicycle riding postman for a chat. That was in the days when the delivering postman would accept any letters you needed to post also. He was a very nice man. A few years later when he passed my school he would always give me a wave. Is it only me that remembers those halcyon days when people took pride in their work?
My most recent australia post parcel experience was worse than the usual cut and run. No notice was left. I had no idea there was a parcel to be delivered until I was sent a final notice for collection. The rather gruff notice gave me 7 days to pick up the item from the post office or it would be returned to sender.
Luckily I could get to the post office within the time permitted to retrieve my parcel.
This is indeed very poor service and hard to imagine how much worse it can get. No wait, yes I can. The final notice card would be sent after they've returned the parcel to the sender!
There's no point in complaining to Australia Post. Once upon a time I did that - nothing changed - and my complaint wasn't even acknowledged. My former postie in his great heavenly GPO would be saddened.
So now I just tell friends and acquaintances about my poor service, and we console each other with similar tales.
Thanks for listening.
The "Service Catalogue" has been around a long time. Which Ronnie is your organisation?
Most would probably agree that the new Westfield complex on Pitt St mall Sydney is bright, shiny, and very stylish. It's choc-a-block with designer label stores - small on stock and very large on price.
I'm not quite sure who's shopping there. Most of it would be a bit rich for your average Sydney office worker. Perhaps it's the tourists.
But regardless of whether you're actually buying, you probably want to navigate to stores of interest rather than aimlessly wandering and being blinded by the floor tiles.
So what do you do? You proceed to the nearest directory. Not wanting premature blindness, that's what I did.
I was expecting a large board with a colour-coded, numbered store list to be cross referenced on a map sporting a "You are here" sticker.
This traditional form of directory has been supplanted with a touch screen. You select your store or category after which a graphic figure shows the directions to walk through the virtual shopping centre.
It was all very swish but there is a definite downside. Only one person can use this electronic directory at any one time. The traditional directory can accommodate as many people as can stand in front of it simultaneously.
Do people really sit around thinking up new technology just to replace manual systems without identifying extra value or the benefit to be had? Do they say to themselves "that's nice but if I applied technology it would be cool". The sad thing is, apparently so.
Technology is supposed to be an enabler - making things more accessible, not less! If you want to be both cool and accessible, perhaps an iphone app to supplement a traditional directory would be a better idea.
Whoever that geek was - why did Westfield listen to them?
I just got around to posting the youtube video of the itsmfa conference this year. It was informative and fun. Next year's is in Perth.
I've decided to start a project to critique and potentially rework most of the ITIL diagrams.
Unfortunately many of them, although well meaning and necessary, tend to have been written by practitioners not schooled in graphicacy and break a lot of the gestalt laws - making them hard to interpret.
The purpose of diagrams is to aid human communication. Sometimes diagrams are just not necessary - text may be a perfectly appropriate medium to communicate the idea/s in question.
I've decided to work though the a lifecycle books beginning with the Service Strategy book. The target items will include "tables" because these are also graphical representations.
I will choose my first rework subject this weekend.
If anyone has a specifically hated ITIL diagram/table they wish to offer for review or has a revised version please respond to the blog and we can publish and discuss it.
I look forward to the challenge.
I regularly watch the ABC1 7pm news broadcast and usually pay attention to the weather bulletin to, either confirm my belief of today's weather, or to prepare for weather conditions of the morrow.
Much to my surprise last Sunday when I viewed the national weather chart of capital cities, Sydney was missing. However Lord Howe Is. was present to represent the state of NSW.
Did the majority of 4.5m of Sydney residencies suddenly get the idea to go native and relocate? The few hundred inhabitants of Lord Howe Is, whose size is 10 x 2 km, would be feeling rather overwhelmed I expect. Indeed the island would probably sink!
So let's assume Sydney is still the most populous city in NSW. It certainly looked that way to me on my journeys to work over the last week.
The obvious assumption is somone has missed with the mouse and "Auntie" has stuffed up in attention to detail yet again. The really poor thing however is that LH Is. first appeared last Sunday night and tonight, Saturday - 6 days later, LH Is. is still the capital of NSW!
I emailed "media watch" on Thursday because I thought this couldn't pass unnoticed.
I await the Sunday news bulletin - will they have picked up the gaff? Probably not. It's a weekend after all and I expect it will take an executive of the ABC to watch "media watch" to discover the error.
What has this to do with service management you ask. Everything. The service to be provided was an accurate weather report and it failed. The SLA with the public failed to be met because of poor attention to detail. Service management 101 tells us this.
The quality of production values for the ABC1 news bulletins is in decline. There are often issues with video or audio links, or the failure of cue cards, plus there's the corny scriptwriter that needs to be shot.
Let us see if Lord Howe Is. continues to the capital of NSW into it's 2nd week and how long this error will be perpetrated.
From the misfortunes of a colleague, I was recently introduced to a new error that beats the good old PC "blue screen of death" hands down.
There has been much complaint about Microsoft's Vista - indeed ever since it appeared in beta. Mostly the arguments have been around lack of compatibility and drivers. I will now add stability/reliability to the list.
The trigger for a fatal crash displaying "catastrophic failure" was plugging in an external USB drive. Ironically this was for the purpose of backup.
There was no ability to restore service from this crash. The only options available were to run diagnostics and review the setup. It wouldn't even boot off a CD! After consulting with IT support it was also determined not to be hardware related.
How can a non-hardware related crash be so bad that the only recovery was to reformat?
I wouldn't have believed this except I saw it.
Information Technology has been around for several decades now, why is the quality of product so low? Why, in the race to market, are such high levels of bugginess acceptable.
Perhaps it's because the technology manufacturers can get away with it. Customers seem to accept it as the norm. But then maybe this is only because there's not really any choice - yes Mac's and Apple have their issues too.
Will there be a tipping point when the people revolt and throw their technology in the bin and revert to pen and paper?
As each year (no, each day) passes we become more tied to our technology in so many ways. So consensual rejection of technology is not likely to happen, but I do wonder that there is no end. Technology is organically evolving and continuing to look more and more like star trek - the ipad first appeared in Deep Space 9, didn't it.
The vision of a remote island (or even the garden shed) with no computer, phones and certainly no ipod, is a delight reserved only for the very few and then very briefly on a holiday - unless you plan of becoming a Tibetan monk.
So in the pursuit of survival and happiness we work with what we have.
Sensibly the said colleague reformatted and installed Windows 7 much to the relief of all those attempting to provide support. Not that windows 7 is by any means perfect, but it does have drivers for most mainstream devices and I'm hoping some of the bad lessons of vista have been learnt and applied to this OS.
What can I say, "change is inevitable - except from a vending machine" Robert C. Gallagher
Are you constantly forgetting to buy that bottle of milk on the way home or make that birthday call to aunt Sarah? Or have you committed the unforgivable of missing an anniversary?
Postit notes have served us well for many years as that short-term memory jogger. Any office, home or corporate, is a silent testament to their use with most people's PC screens adorned with at least one sticky note.
The sticky notes applet appeared some years ago and I recall being not that much impressed by it and promptly forgot it. It's now part of windows 7 and "techrepublic" brought it back to my attention.
With the ever increasing busyness of our lives and the constant demands diverting our immediate attention, yellow stickies have become an institution and an important enabler to getting on with our lives. But they do have a risk factor: "write once, lose many times".
As I reflect on my engagement with the written word in the last 2 years I observe a major evolution in my practices. I read books, yes, but unless it's a major text, I do a lot of my reading on electronic devices. I have noted that my handwriting has gone to pot because I rarely write any more. I type into an electronic device - usually my laptop, which has become my most important business-critical possession. I don't even write a shopping list, I type it.
So it's time to embrace electronic "sticky notes". I know I've decided to.
Follow the link in the title to techrepublic's article in tips on how to use and customise it.
But easter was significant for Qantas. They had 4 incidents in the space of one week featuring engine troubles, an exploding tyre and a cracked window. Their damage control processes all seemed to work affectively however and everyone was delivered safely back to earth.
As expected, the media jumped on Qantas' safety record and the organisation addressed the concerns accordingly. I expected that to be the end of it until another incident occured.
Qantas CEO Alan Joyce seized the moment to engage his customers. He sent an email (click the title link to read) to all his customers explaining in good detail what occurred, how and what was being done to address the issues. He also took the opportunity to reinforce the core values and deliverables of the Qantas organisation.
Many CEO's would be inclined to run away from all but the necessary damage control activities but Qantas has embraced it's service failures and used customer engagement for a positive outcome.
More service providers should take a note from this. Customers don't really want to hear everything's going well. They want to hear about how you manage the things that don't go well and that you understand their needs.
Apart from the clarity of picture, there was much hype that new movies and TV series would be crafted towards the new medium. You would be able to do things like: zoom in/out on aspects of any scene, or watch the movie from different angles and from different characters' perspectives.
These features never materialised due to the costs to produce. Was it right to set expectations so high? Ah well, this is all past but a historical lesson should be learnt even so.
But what of today's offerings? The user interface of practically any DVD I encounter is so unintuitive. Silly gimmick icons and non logical directional movements and submenus make it very difficult to access the actual product. Just turning on/off subtitles can be a challenge.
It's been a medium crying out for some UI standards for 10 years now.
Technology is moving on, the faster/easier alternative these days is to download your video of choice. So I suppose DVD UI's will never evolve - just disappear.
As we are are more and more encouraged (well, pushed really) to adopt technology to self-service we do increase these major risks to delivery.
Is the speed of transaction plus the ability to cut staffing levels so much cheaper when you factor in the losses of when things fail? I don't really mind when organisations such as Jestar do their sums and say 'yes' to this question. But I expect most organisations do not even consider to factor it in.
But there you go, expect to see more and more of this in every aspect of your daily life as self-service is only on the increase. Not that's necessarily a bad thing, in fact I often like to self-serve, I like the consistency of this kind of service. However, if the manual backup hasn't been factored in, the continuity of the service is compromised.
Oh, and before I close, Amadeus, we're all still waiting.
I know of a major financial institution's mortgage calculator that was found to be wrong and a manufacturer who accidentally destroyed a whole day's product due to an electronic system deeming the new produce to be past it's use-by date. There were several other glitches picked up before the fatal date also.
The major message of what we should remember from this period is the massive effort applied to defining and documenting manual workarounds for all major business processes. For the first time in their history some businesses were thinking about continuity plans.
So what should we have learnt? What happens when the technology fails? And it will fail. IT systems now have a complexity that no one person can understand end-to-end. We live in a world where businesses and people are atrophied by technology failure.
The photo I've attached is from the front door of my local Priceline store. Apologies for the quality of the photo - it was after dark and a cheap camera.
Priceline's computers were down and therefore "naturally" they closed the store until further notice!
I can understand not being willing to wear the risk of dispensing some medications without electronic verification but I don't understand why they couldn't trade other items. Can I not buy shampoo? Does their cash register not function at all? That would be extremely poor design.
And, I know it's painful, but those paperbased credit card swipe devices still work (taxi drivers still seem to love them). Obviously without the eft you wouldn't be able to provide a cashout facility but people would be ok with that if explained - plus there were 3 ATMs within half a block. The rewards scheme also wouldn't work - but who was the turkey who implemented that without some form of manual process as backup.
So, bottom line, priceline has no manual processes and appears willing to risk cessation of business when their technology fails.
I don't know how long this store was closed because of the cop out of "our computers are down" but I must say I find that pretty poor business practice.
Get real priceline - get some continuity processes. And I repeat, did we (priceline, because I know I did) learn nothing from Y2K?
It was time to go blackberry, as I'm more needing to access email while out and about plus the occasional need to access the web on the road.
So I summoned my strength and walked into a large telstra shop and made the request of the first sales assistant that approached me.
Over the years, australian telcos have conditioned me to understand that nothing is easy or straightforward when it comes to telephony. I find this a depressing state of affairs but was prepared for the worst and Telstra certainly didn't disappoint on this occasion.
I have never lost or damaged a mobile phone. A condition which has led me to be in possession of an 8 year old sim card. This is where the trouble started. Attempting to port my number to a new sim card generated an insurmountable error.
The shop assistant was trying hard to assist and I do not blame her for any shortcomings in service, the screens she had to deal with were poorly designed and technical support didn't seem to be particularly supportive at the other end of the line.
After much putting on hold and futile retrying of the same action, "technical support" communicated an SLA of 72 hours for resolution through the unfortunate assistant.
I had been served promptly when I entered the shop, but it was over an hour later when I left with a non-functioning blackberry and the deep conviction I would be back 72 hours later.
The magical thing that was supposed to happen in the ensuing 72 hours was that my old sim in my old phone was to stop working and my new sim in my bright shiny blackberry was spontaneously to burst forth like a butterfly from a moth's cocoon.
Needless to say my new phone still did not work. I returned to telstra. It was lunchtime, there was a queue (20 mins), which didn't help, but I stoically endured that. After all, I believe in service and understand demand management can be difficult. When I did get served and explanations were made of the pre-existing condition, we proceed down the exact same faultfinding path the previous assistant had tried which culminated in the obvious call to the tech non-support and a lot of on hold time for the customer-facing guy.
An hour and more passes...... we get to the exact same impasse - I didn't even get to sit down in this telstra shop (my feet hurt) - possibly intentional to frustrate and move people on quickly. Apart from causing my feet pain and delay my return to work, this was not sufficient torture for me to give up on my quest to resolve the issue. But as per the previous telstra shop experience, nothing was to be gained in store. This time an SLA of 24 hours is communicated to me - presumably I've now managed to pass some escalation threshold and am entitled to better than the "standard" 72 hrs.
I ensure I am given my case number and a phone number that I may take it up with the invisible "tech support" myself when the next 24 hours expires. The shop assistant is just as relieved and happy to provide the info - I wonder where he is on the timeline to turning over in his thankless job.
Surprisingly a little less than 1 hour before the new SLA of 24 hours was up, the amazing transformation occurred! The cynic in me says the invisible tech non-support planned this timing but I don' think they could be that organised. The resolution was to my relief, however, because I really didn't want to have to do battle - I just want my phone to work and 4 days to get a sim card working is totally unacceptable.
I felt (in delusion) that my poor service experience should have been seriously unusual, and in an organisation that actually cared about their customers' experience I should have been furnished with some attempt at an apology - even if it was only lip service. No apology of any kind, or attempt to survey my experience, was forthcoming. If this is the service norm they are probably too terrified of the results of surveying the customer.
A week later, however, I did get a phone call from Telstra. Thankfully, for all concerned, it went to voicemail. Being human, the content of the call may have caused me to loose my composure. "As a premium telstra customer, you're entitled to a coaching package with your new service account to the value of $160"!
- there is a total disconnect between the front-line customer staff and the back-office technical support staff resulting in the guys on the floor left to fend for themselves as best they can with angry, disillusioned and disempowered customers
- Totally unacceptable SLA's, e.g., 72+ hours to fix a sim porting number problem!
- Attempting to offer value add services when they can't even get the basics right
To be fair, Telstra isn't the only telco to blame for the extremely poor standard of service. I've had just as poor experiences in procuring Optus products over the years.
But Australia is in a telco duopoly who own 80% of the market between them. There are other telcos but the nearest only has 10% market share (no prizes for knowing who that is) and the rest vie for the remaining share. This bottom 20% have little or no infrastructure of their own and are forced to onsell Telstra and Optus products and services. Somewhere between a rock and a hard place you might say.
Boys and girls, we are prisoners of whatever the top 2 telco's deem to be service. All I can say is thank god I update my phone only every 3 years or so.
My broadband may need attention before then though - heavy sigh. Maybe I'll have some valium before I attempt that one.
But I'm getting a little tired of the outsourced contracted postie of today finding it all too hard to actually deliver parcels. I've posted about this before and it has happened again that the postie will not buzz my intercom.
According to AustPost's website they make every effort to deliver parcels safely but when you outsource the courier it's a bit difficult to ensure the quality of this statement.
I work from home often and as it is an apartment building, you can imagine the letter boxes will not accommodate a parcel. Where possible I have parcels directed to my city postbox but oftentimes the vendor will not accept a PO box leaving me no alternative but to use my home address.
I know I was present in my home office the entire day when the latest parcel failed to be delivered. The sound of my intercom would wake up an entire regiment, so there's no way I missed it. Finding the "sorry we missed you"-type note in my letterbox at the end of the day was not welcome. I now had to go out of my way to visit the local post office to collect my parcel which I should have already been in possession of! Adding to my aggravation was that it was large and heavy.
Alas for the days of my youth when the postie was friendly, chatted to small children, patted the cat and, oh what was that nice little value add......delivered parcels.
I figure Australia Post just doesn't care about the quality of this service. And the folks that use them should have some idea that sometimes cheap is just nasty.