Produced by Scripps Interactive News Group, this short documentary conceptually explores hospice care practices and contemporary issues, honing in on one family’s experience with Amedisys Hospice Care of Knoxville, Tennessee.
New post by the lovely Pilar, entitled ‘Keep your shoes on.’ About childhood creativity, and what it really means to exist barefoot.
About aging, returning home, and facing the fact that time does go on. And so do we.
creative nonfiction — stories about childhood friends, and the curious detail of it all.
I am looking for jobs, right? I just want to draw this picture for you, because it boggled my mind the moment I realized this. So, I’m looking for jobs, when I come across a website for backpacking through Europe. Specifically, I was looking for a temporary job, doing clinical sleep trials :), when this happened. Very random, and totally unrelated. So then, my mind wanders down the page of other similar links, and I come across students abroad, and then working abroad. Hm…. working abroad. Yeah, that sounds awesome. I mean, I’m not doing anything right now, I mean other than applying to jobs and obsessing over my new blog, and obsessing over the idleness of an unemployed and job searching life. Why not work abroad right? I need something new. I am dehydrated, almost, and am delighted by the idea of knowing no one or familiarity, even though my social anxiety disorder would typically opt out of that kind of situation. Just soaking up new sights, new situations, new people. Eating food that shocks my palate, energizing it, and me. I’m going to apply to jobs overseas. Wouldn’t it be funny though if I got a weird job on a cruise? It’s like at this point, I would work anywhere, and where’ I’ve worked in the past would somehow make sense of this career transition. Like, at an interview, the woman almost laughed at the diversity of my job experience, and I charismatically quipped in return “Well, I think my diverse background sets me apart as a strong candidate.” My experiences are laughable. Yikes. Oh, so where I was going with that? My observation (and astonishing observation, at that). So, I come across a website called GoAbroad.com. And there, I find a scroll down menu to choose in which I’d like to search for jobs. I can choose a country. This is almost strange. I feel like opportunities like this, with such ease and quantity as they exist, is absolutely changing the way we envision our lives. Or something. It’s just weird that you can set some search engine keywords and end up flying on over to Austria (because they have this really cool media coordinator position calling your name), and you end up there for 5 years, or something. It seems like the landscape of our lives (communally and individually), is drastically shifting —- all because of a little scroll down menu. The options are endless, bizarre, potential. So I ask you, now what? Now what?
Aw, cute arthouse number. (500) Days of Summer. Aw! And Zooey Deschanel and Joseph Gordon-Levitt are starring in it! Check. It’s permanently on the list of must-sees. Then a few months pass by. And here it is. By now, the enthusium is peaking. Final verdict after watching (500) Days of Summer: (shudder) Really?
(500) Days of Summer Critically Acclaimed?
The film is lauded by a number of critics as one of the best of 2009, and was even received with a standing ovation at Sundance. Okay, so the film is presented with a curious narrator (stamina of a Jim Carey film) and offers up glowing and narratively empty, and subsequently mysterious, characters, for comedic effect. However, it’s the estrangement of the film’s separately innovative elements when they attempt to come together that altogether brings the project crashing down. For example, the cutesy hipster music comes in with poor timing, thus disrupting the dialogic timing between Deschanel and Gordon-Levitt’s exchange. Latching onto the playfulness of genre teasing, as well as the poorly developed narrative swoop into the “No Man’s Land” of the emo love story gone crashing into the ground, (500) Days of Summer pulls off nothing short of an eccentric and dorky aesthetic melange, with a dash of complete disregard for temporal conventions. Tom, a 20-something year old greeting card writer, meets Summer Finn, a new employee at his company in Los Angeles. Summer is entreatingly cute, and a subscriber to the unattached, ‘light’ love affair. Nothing serious. (500) Days of Summer offers a nonlinear plot of Tom’s flashbacks of his relationship with Summer, marking their good, bad, and awkward times over a period of 500 days. Tom’s memory is connected by montages that aim to express ‘falling in love’ or ‘breaking up’, but leave the film’s tone both confused, disorderly, and inconsistent. The outrageous transitional pieces include noir done poorly and quickly, as well as Deschanel’s blank performance that screams French New Wave Mediocre. In this way, the film positions itself as a rom-com that is making fun of rom-coms. However, the viewer needs to be in on the joke in order for genre bending and misuse to work.
Cutesy and Depthless: Intention vs. Reality
Director Marc Webb offers some insight into Summer Finn’s elusive character. “Yes, Summer has elements of the manic pixie dream girl - she is an immature view of a woman. She’s Tom’s view of a woman. He doesn’t see her complexity and the consequence for him is heartbreak. In Tom’s eyes, Summer is perfection, but perfection has no depth. Summer’s not a girl, she’s a phase.” Webb’s attempt to personify this notion of depthless perfection, seems after looking critically at Deschanel’s performance, to either be highly difficult to pull off, or a poor casting call. The viewer, in one way, anticipates the intimate and real connection between Gordon-Levitt and Deschanel. However, the moments where Summer and Joseph seem to share a connection, are moments marked by cutesy, asinine interactions that are based on nothing real. There’s a friction between the viewer’s expectations and the film’s intention (i.e. to throw rom-com’s off a cliff; or more like, push them on the playground), and this friction is not productive. Tom and Summer’s relationship, and Summer specifically, are only made depthless by the film’s lack of disclosure of any intimate or intellectual exchanges that the characters share during onscreen montages. Or rather, Webb’s intention of presenting the character of Summer as vacant and perfect, ends up injuring the effect of storyline and execution. In one way, this cavity can be seen in Tom’s pining after Summer, as it never has the chance to make sense because the writing doesn’t allow it to make sense; Summer is vacant , and Tom’s interactions with her are vacant throughout their entire relationship. What’s missing, then, is the verisimilitude of Tom’s desire to win her back (in one reading of this lack of narrative information). The question then stands: how do you show empty intimacy without making the writing look terrible or unintentional, and without reeling in and pissing off your audience? The latter concern may may not necessarily be Webb’s shared concern. Remember: the film is made to frustrate the conventional rom-com viewer. This is an intention worth lauding, if done correctly. The film soaks in (and it takes the entire piece to really marinate), and resonates as an issue of ‘intention vs. reality’. Understanding a director’s intentions, as well as experiencing his/her intentions via the medium, are two very different things.
Over-the-Top Aesthetic
Taking on a variety of genres, as well as a seemingly highly unpredictable storyline of boy-likes-girl; girl-runs-for-the-hills, (500) Days of Summer reveals one consistency amidst all the aesthetic and narrative turmoil: heavy-handedness. Much after Tom and Summer’s breakup, the viewer is offered a split-screen montage depicting Tom’s hopes vs. Tom’s realities. The ‘reality’ screen reveals Summer’s hand with a wedding ring on her finger. Rather than thinking, ‘Whoa, that’s so unlike Summer to get married,’ the viewer just doesn’t care. Summer is difficult to read throughout; however, it’s a blend of the writing and Deschanel that has caused this discrepancy.
Casting Zooey Deschanel
Here’s a lesson learned: Deschanel and Gordon-Levitt have very little onscreen chemistry. Both actors separately produce fabulous work and provide acute and sophisticated performances. But, together? Not so much. It’s not their fault. Take The Happening, for instance. Deschanel was cast alongside Mark Wahlberg. Um, match made in a strange hell much? Well, a hell that has gone minimalist. On the other hand, the film provides some evidence here that point to an alternate theory: Deschanel is totally awkward at love scenes. Deschanel in a lesbian/queer role needs to be witnessed before this statement stands on its own. You never know. Her awkward and, at times, cute, flirtatious performances may work way better bouncing off of a woman. What happened to the Zooey of Almost Famous? Don’t worry; she’ll be back. Alongside Katherine Moennig of The L Word (hopefully).
Sources: Wiseman, Eva (2009-08-16). “‘Is there such a thing as “the one” - and what happens if you lose her?”. London: The Guardian. http://www.guardian.co.uk/film/2009/aug/16/500-days-of-summer.