Background image

Greg Brown

I'm a student affairs professional working in the woods of northern Michigan. To put it plainly, I help high school kids learn all the life-lessons that they don't teach in class. (I also blog and stuff.)

Posts

  • March 01, 11:51 AM

    David Foster Wallace, speaking of something missing.

    (excerpted from this interview, offered up as evidence)

    In light of this, I’m going to try switching up my style - posting everything on Mondays as a collection of what I thought worth saving from the last week. Hopefully this will encourage me to punctuate it more with stories, thoughts, and other things that make me too self-conscious to justify their own blog posts. Really, anything works that will fit in the flow.

    To match the style, I’ve switched themes to Thijs Jacob’s Stationery. It pushes a paper-metaphor, but keeps the visuals abstract enough to work on the web. Stationery cries out for a one-post-per-page style, and provided a good deal of the inspiration for adopting this new technique of posting; it really is good enough that you should click through to each post of mine, instead of reading each off the dashboard (which omits little things like horizontal rules and H3 styling). Another inspiration was Things Magazine, who rattle off a few paragraphs and loosely-connected links every few days in one big chunk. Finally, I wanted to get in the habit of using Notational Velocity and Simplenote to continuously tweak my writing, whether sitting at my computer or simply re-reading a draft on my iPhone. Writing in Markdown has helped tremendously, and will even make footnotes super-easy if I decide to scratch that itch.

    With that said, here goes nothing.


    I’m watching The Wire again with my girlfriend, and it’s been great to get her perspective as a first-time viewer. I had permanently consigned it to simply being the “best show ever” on my first watching, but with the perspective of having watched Mad Men now, the picture is much more complicated.

    The beginning of the show is deliberately cluttered and messy, with major characters being introduced as late as the third episode. It’s nothing out of the norm for any usual show, but in the hyper-dense ensemble of The Wire we’re shocked to see Omar suddenly appear in episode 3 without much warning or explanation. For someone already grappling with the Baltimore dialect and the constant shifting of scenes in space and time, it can be awfully overwhelming.

    One unexpected element was the technique - shared by David Foster Wallace’s works and a few other (usually auteur) productions - of repeatedly circling a point and hinting at it from all sorts of angles without coming out and saying it. The Wire occasionally breaks this to engage in nearly-fourth-wall-breaking quips and aphorisms, but at its best maintains the effect.

    This technique of elision is becoming more popular over the years, I think, largely because it produces a dread of things unseen that seems particular to the modern world. For all Thomas Friedman’s annoying habits, his exultation of globalism did hint at larger cultural forces that go beyond simple economic trends. We live in a web of interconnections, but are only able to grasp a small fraction of the links at any one time. In dumping the traditional catch-all explanations for bad things - religious, ideological, or otherwise - we are still left with the unspoken sense that something out there is menacing us.

    The Wire hints (and more) at a world where the institutions we’ve built have ensnared us, where we are now tools for the once-tools we built. Mad Men hints that our identity may be at once both more and less than the sum of our actions, and in a social morality that is askew from our interpersonal instincts and any imagined attempt to correct it. A Serious Man asks if we can be counted on to remain ourselves in the face of chaos and hardship, and whether the world is even knowable at all. All rely on the niggling feeling that we’ve lost one of the reels of the film, that though the characters stories are concluded, the tension that beset them is still out there, coiled up in the world and in ourselves.


    A selection of links

    I posted this infographic of the projected Pacific tsunamis from the Chile earthquake, and it’s still gorgeous. Thankfully, the tsunami in Hawaii and other places was less than feared.

    A classic YouTube video made trippier, and another still cracks me up every time.

    David Foster Wallace would have been 48 years old last week. It still hurts, but re-reading McSweeney’s memories and tributes helped.

    Nick Currie was interviewed on Marketplace of Ideas and transcribed on 3QuarksDaily, and I was really taken by this quote (which explains some of the appeal of Lost in Translation):

    Japan is just a classic parallel world: it’s an island on the other side of the world from Britain, kind of the same shape as Britain, and yet so totally different… When you look at Last.fm top ten lists for countries, people scrobbling their favorite music all over the world, Japan is the only non-Anglo-Saxon country that has 70 or 80 percent of scrobbled tracks coming from their domestic territory. That’s kind of incredible, because is suggests that Japan is the only advanced “other” culture that exists out there.

    The Chinese are, at least as they’re using Last.fm, are not listening to Chinese material beyond, say, ten, 20 percent. The French might go to 40 percent: they’ve got Phoenix, Daft Punk, Air and Serge Gainsbourg, but that’s unusually high. Most countries are totally supplied by the Anglosphere when it comes to pop music. It’s a one-way culture flow. It’s a hub-and-spoke model: there’s this powerful center, which is the while, Anglo-Saxon center, allied with black music also, which is spreading popular music and culture from this central point which is L.A., London, New York, outwards, all over the world. And it’s globalization serving a very small number of interests, these five mega music corporations which are very centralized.

    I find it fascinating that the Japanese have managed to, by a kind of passive aggression, set up an alternative culture which is super-advanced — I would say even more advanced than ours — and yet has totally its own cultural landscape, its own TV shows. You don’t see American shows on Japanese terrestrial TV, you don’t hear — of course, you can buy every Western artist you want in a Japanese record store, but mostly the Japanese are just interested in their own culture, the culture they make, and it’s so different.

  • February 27, 05:16 PM

    Gorgeous infographic of the projected rise in sea levels due to the Chile earthquake. (from the NOAA’s West Coast and Alaska Tsunami Warning Center)

  • February 27, 04:48 PM

    Watch the tsunami come into Hawaii live on Ustream. This is absolutely surreal, that I can watch this live on the internet and it’s being treated with all the detachment of a weather forecast for tomorrow’s commute.

  • February 19, 10:45 PM

    I will be taking a break from The Internet for a while, owing to a steadily-growing fear that books might die Any Moment Now. (You may laugh but when they die on Thursday, you’ll be sorry you weren’t at their bedside.) Also, we lost the internet and phones for the whole morning (! with a healthy dose of widespread panic) and it was actually pretty nice.

    In the meantime, please accept this simple occasionally-live offering of post-literary puppies. They are starting to get big and extra cute, but you still realize how small they are when one of their owners dwarfs them in the frame.

  • February 18, 10:30 AM

    Big Numbers

    • “About 20 percent of Canada’s entire policing capacity has descended on the Olympics.” (via NYT)
      • “4,500 members of the Canadian armed forces are patrolling the mountains, air and sea while living in a dozen specially constructed camps.”
    • “the number of cell phone subscriptions across the globe will hit 5 billion sometime in 2010” (via CNET, from ITU)
      • Of which 1 billion will have internet access through their phones
        • Out of a 6.8 billion global population
      • This number will increase by another 3 billion over the next 5 years. (via ComputerWeekly)
        • And eventually reach 50 billion connected devices globally in 2020.

  • February 17, 01:00 PM

    iPad-enabled web design

    The zooming capability of MobileSafari (on the iPad and iPhone) demands some sort of clever Powers-of-10-style use. I imagine a website that you don’t read by scrolling, but successively zooming in - each stage revealing yet another stage of too-tiny-to-read text that you must zoom in further to see. Unfortunately, MobileSafari maxes out at 3-4x zoom so this idea is kind of limited in practice. :(

    (We can still approximate it in silly flash gadgets, though.)

  • February 16, 05:20 PM

    Popcap Games just released the iPhone version of Plants vs. Zombies yesterday, and it’s as addictive as the original. Since the game requires doing things speedily, it’s not quite as mobile-friendly as their adaptation of Peggle, which allows your attention to flit to non-phone stuff temporarily without penalty. Once you start a level, you have to pay pretty close attention all the way to the end. You can still exit at any time and the game will save your progress in that level, though.

    It’s a steal at $3, and well worth your time too!

    (They also have a version you can play in your web browser, if you want to try it out. Like any good dealer, the first hit is free.)

  • February 16, 01:24 AM

    Scientists Briefly Break a Law of Nature

    Physicists said Monday that they had whacked a tiny region of space with enough energy to briefly distort the laws of physics, providing the first laboratory demonstration of the kind of process that scientists suspect has shaped cosmic history.

    The departure from normal physics manifested itself in the apparent ability of the briefly freed quarks to tell right from left. That breaks one of the fundamental laws of nature, known as parity, which requires that the laws of physics remain unchanged if we view nature in a mirror.

    This happened in bubbles smaller than the nucleus of an atom, which lasted only a billionth of a billionth of a billionth of a second.

    As the article goes on to note, this provides another clue as to why the battle of matter vs. antimatter - which should have been profoundly even to the point of canceling everything out, converting all to energy - was so soundly won by matter that we have galaxies and stars and planets and internet blogs still around today.

    SCIENCE!

  • February 15, 11:27 AM

    I got Zoe a hypnotizing Courage Wolf last Christmas, but couldn’t resist unpacking it first to gaze upon it myself.

  • February 13, 01:16 PM

    The Congo Movie Rating System

    As he was leaving the theater, my dad had an epiphany: Congo was exactly the quality of movie that, having paid for a full-price ticket, he would not walk out on. He would never pay to rent it. He probably wouldn’t even want to spend an evening watching it for free (though with the right incentive he could sit through it). And if it happened to be on TV in the other room, he might even get a modicum of enjoyment out of listening to it, provided he was doing something else at the time. But he wouldn’t walk out of it.

    Thus he established the baseline from which the Congo Rating Scale was born.

    By definition, regardless of how much you may like the movie, Congo is worth exactly one Congo, and just as in any other measurement system, this fact does not change in the same way that a meter is always one meter long.

    Above the baseline, The Congo Rating is a logarithmic scale whose units are made up of integers up to 100. Below the baseline, movies receive fractions of Congos with zero as a lower-limit (there is no such thing as a movie getting negative Congos). This range from zero to one is reserved for movies you wouldn’t even watch if you paid for them, and if someone paid you to watch them it would create a real internal conflict.

    The “Congo Movie Rating System” from Charge Shot!!! is pretty awesome, even more awesome than diamond lasers shooting gorilla-human hybrids. I would rate it 15 Congos.

  • February 12, 10:26 AM

    How to turn your room into a giant pinhole camera

    Some of my kids at school did this last weekend, and it was the coolest thing I’ve seen all year.

    Needed:

    • A very sunny day
    • Enough cardboard to cover your window
    • A thin white bedsheet
    • Scissors or something else that can cut through cardboard
    • Masking or Duct Tape

    Steps:

    1. Cover your window in the cardboard. Duct-tape around the edges so that no extra light gets by; we want the room to be pitch dark.
    2. Poke/cut a hole in the cardboard. This is your giant “pinhole”. Make it small at first; it’s easier to widen it later.
    3. Hang a bedsheet in the room so the light shines through the hole onto it.
    4. The ratio between pinhole-size and hole-bedsheet distance should be something from 1:100 to about 1:500 (relying on various online sources for smaller models). Varying the distance means that the image gets bigger or smaller AND changes how sharp the image is. A wider pinhole lets through more light, but makes it more difficult to get the right distance to focus it.
    5. Once you’ve hung the bedsheet initially, turn off all lights in the room and let your eyes adjust. Sit in a chair so the bedsheet is between you and the hole. You should be able to faintly see an image on the bedsheet of everything outside, but upside down. That’s how your eye’s lens works too; the brain just flips everything around in the decoding process so that it looks right-side up.
    6. Send a friend outside to run and jump around to get the full effect of a projected image. Widen the hole if you need more light, or try adjusting the bedsheet distance to sharpen the image. HAVE FUN.
  • February 11, 08:59 AM
    “Filtering, not remembering, is the most important skill for those who use the Internet.

    Before the Internet, most professional occupations required a large body of knowledge, accumulated over years or even decades of experience. But now, anyone with good critical thinking skills and the ability to focus on the important information can retrieve it on demand from the Internet, rather than her own memory.

    On the other hand, those with wandering minds, who might once have been able to focus by isolating themselves with their work, now often cannot work without the Internet, which simultaneously furnishes a panoply of unrelated information — whether about their friends’ doings, celebrity news, limericks, or millions of other sources of distraction. The bottom line is that how well an employee can focus might now be more important than how knowledgeable he is.”

    David Dalrymple, a researcher at the MIT Mind Machine Project, answers the question “How is the Internet changing the way you think?”

    It’s the latest entry in the Edge’s World Question Center, which each year asks hundreds of scientists and other intellectuals to answer one question. All the answers are available online at the above link, and there are so many gems hidden in there. Very recommended if you’re bored and need a few days of reading.

  • February 10, 05:38 PM

    Gratuitous Picture Of Yourself Wednesday: Facial Hair February edition!

    The beard-ification process is going a little bit slower than I’d hoped. A student asked me yesterday if I was going for “hipster scruffy.” :(

  • February 09, 01:40 PM

    Mid-afternoon sun in Michigan through dirty window.

  • February 08, 01:51 PM

    Simen on Sternfeld's "American Prospects"

    Simen blogs at dailymeh, which happens to be neither nor. He just posted a big essay on Joel Sternfeld’s collection of photography called American Prospects, and it’s full of the awesome that makes his awesome awesome. The essay begins like this:

    American Prospects is a book of sighs, puns and awe. They are the kind of sighs, puns and awe that last longer than a moment, though; the kind that aren’t unreflective emotional ripples, things you experience in a moment and forget in the next, but rather, the low-key kind of emotion you experience when you’ve observed something for a long time, thought about it, and finally come down on an emotion and released it. These pictures have stood the test of time, although it would be an insult to suggest that they owe their quality to the patina of age.

  • February 06, 01:50 PM
    “As [Roy] Smith says, a world with over $100 trillion in liquidity is by its nature a world prone to bubbles: a tiny slosh of that money in a certain direction can cause massively destabilizing effects in formerly-sleepy corners of the market.”
    Felix Salmon, summarizing Roy Smith’s thesis that financial innovation raises the risk of bubbles by way of turning illiquid assets liquid.
  • February 05, 06:20 PM

    Puppycam? Puppycam!

  • February 04, 05:48 PM

    Nicholas “feltron” Felton just linked to this “Autobiography ver. 2” painting by Ward Shelly, who specializes in the sort of flowing-infographics I enjoyed so much as a child. Even better, all of his paintings have high-resolution copies on his website so you can take in all the hand-crafted details.

  • February 04, 08:34 AM
    “What is prestige? Is it the shadow of power or the substance of power? We are going to work on the substance of power. No doubt we will be kicked in the ass for the next couple of weeks, but that won’t affect the main business.”

    John F. Kennedy, reflecting after the failed Bay of Pigs invasion in Lessons in Disaster by Gordon M. Goldstein (paperback p. 41).

    As chronicled in the book, the Bay of Pigs invasion was expected by the CIA to fail. The hope was that the young, untested president would panic and authorize military assistance, which is what the CIA had hoped for the whole time. As we know, Kennedy did not accede to those demands and stubbornly refused to intervene. Factions within the administration argued that letting them fail would amount to harming American prestige, but Kennedy shot back as seen above.

    It seems strange to me that so little is made of the latter answer to that question, and so much of the former. It’s true that they’re largely co-extensive and that the shadow contains some meager substance of its own, but we still lack good story frameworks to present and dramatize the substance of power. Our political reporting plays out more like People and less like The Power Broker, and so much is missed in the gap.

  • February 02, 01:14 PM
    “Prose fiction must first of all perform the traditional functions of storytelling. We need stories. We can’t identify ourselves without them. We’re always telling ourselves stories about who we are - that’s what history is, what the idea of a nation or an individual is. The purpose of fiction is to help us answer the question we must constantly be asking ourselves: who do we think we are and what do we think we are doing.”
    Robert Stone in an interview with Paris Review (collected in The Paris Review Interviews Vol 1, p. 326-7).
  • February 01, 10:19 AM

    More commonly known as the couch

    • GF: If you're going to make fun of me for not remembering that book from Mad Men, then I'll have the nice chair.
    • Me: Well then I'll have the MORAL nice chair.
  • January 30, 12:51 AM
    “In a democracy, political engagement is an act of patriotism, a declaration of faith in the judgment of one’s fellow citizens and thus, ultimately, in one’s nation. Michael Walzer is right that the truly effective social critics are embedded in their societies and operate at least as much out of love as from alienation. And love is usually dominant.

    In The Company of Critics, Walzer quotes the Polish intellectual Adam Michnik: “A movement that does not honor society’s constant values is not sufficiently mature to undertake the reshaping of that society.” Walzer draws the right conclusion: “Criticism is most powerful … when it gives voice to the common complaints of the people or elucidates the values that underlie those complaints.”

    Note the twin obligations Walzer imposes on the critic: the democratic obligation to voice “common complaints” and the intellectual obligation to elucidate values. The latter can be quite subversive of accepted understandings, exposing as it typically does the ways in which a society ignores or violates the values it claims as its bedrock.”

    E.J. Dionne, Jr. writing on the role of critics in society in Dissident Magazine. The essay is part of a larger package of commentary on how “intellectuals” should participate in public discourse.

    David Wiggins takes up a similar strategy in “Objectivity in Ethics,” arguing that an interesting approach to ethics would be to distill out the values of a culture and then test them using “fair first-order criticism” - in effect, to subject them to the same demands of consilience (i.e. consistency and agreement) that we do theories about science. He even points to Montaigne as an exemplar of this approach to ethics.

  • January 27, 03:00 PM

    The lighting setup in the new Apple iPad video is pretty over-the-top, especially when the camera zooms into the various execs’ puppy-eyes.

    The machine itself looks very tempting - especially at that price - and I’d probably fool around with it in an Apple Store for a while before deciding to pick one up. Apple’s pushing forward a lot of really interesting things in the computer space, such as ubiquitous connectivity and multi-touch interfaces. Even more interestingly, they’re taking some of the “sacrifices” made for the iPhone (such as minimal-multitasking and an opaque filesystem) and seeing how far they can push them into a serious laptop-style experience. They couldn’t get away with pruning those things from OSX or a Laptop/Desktop experience, so they’re starting from the mobile end and working their way upward.

    Planned or not, the entire company seems structured to develop revolutionary new stuff and then introduce that stuff in a way that ensures people will actually adopt it. Oh, and make tons of money in the process.

  • January 26, 01:34 PM
    “The writer has falsified life, because he has pretended to harmonize something which he is aware of chiefly as confusion and to explain something which he knows he cannot fully understand. His work of art is, therefore, an imposture.

    But the reader, himself balked and bewildered, receives naively the artist’s picture as a true representation of the world. The artist, who has been disconcerted and spurred to produce a work of art by his failure to discover in the universe either harmony or logic, supplies the harmony and logic himself; and the reader, who has himself been hungering for logic or harmony, accepts with joy what the artist gives him, and assumes that the artist’s makeshift is a certified revelation, and the artist an oracle. The reader leans upon the writer: what for the latter is a vague, a confused, or an approximate form of expression, the former applies literally.

    All that department of literature which deals directly with current events—editorial writing, pamphleteering, history, some novel and play writing—is but the painting of the thinnest varnish of reassuring reason and art over earthquakes which actually take place, not in the world of art and reason, but in the barbarous animal world, bloody, uncontrollable, ignoble and all the writer can hope for at best is to divert the attention of his fellows, like a bystander at a street accident who, when the rest of the crowd are only gaping insists upon the removal of the body, or like an actor in a burning theater who tries, by his eloquence or jokes, to avert a panic and stampede.”

    Edmund Wilson, writing “Meditations on Dostoevsky” back in 1928. This is such a powerful rant that I feel compelled to cautiously adopt it for railing against the writers I dislike, and politely ignore it for the writers I love.

    But seriously, it is a fantastic articulation of why some fiction doesn’t sit well with my tummy, giving me creepy-crawlies as I realize how many words I suck in on a daily basis that - in their sheer volume - cannot be subjected to anything more than the most cursory criticism. I fear that all reading amounts to a steady poisoning of oneself against the reality of the world, and find that fear hard to shake.

  • January 25, 07:41 PM

    As meaghano just posted, “David Cole’s post today made me go, ‘Whoaaa!’ Also the form is AWESOME.”

    This has me thinking a lot about things, and what it would look like to really apply game-style principles to encourage writing-based communities. We’ve already seen some rudimentary attempts in the form of NaNoWriMo and Tumblr’s per-post counts of “likes” and “reblogs.” They both, at their gut, help define the value-systems of each effort by what they give points to: the former damns the usual writing neuroses and just focuses on getting words on paper, while the latter clarifies and amplifies the usual popular benchmarks of posts.

    But at the same time there’s other things we could encourage, like the well-curated blog that aptly knows what to reblog and what to let lie. We could encourage the kind of witty banter between blogs, or a long-running grudge of clashing ideologies that still results in genuinely great dialogue. But how can we prize these opportunities amongst others?

    Like the article suggests, there’s a new feedback mechanic that’s starting to flourish in games, one that’s better suited to the sandbox-style open worlds that technology is opening up. Whereas points try to quantify each act - implicitly ignoring others it can’t - achievements don’t really care about 99% of the possibilities. But every once in a while, it dips in to give you a little pat on the back for accomplishing something. Some of the earlier ones were less explicit - such as Grand Theft Auto 3 switching to a movie-style camera for particularly sweet jumps - but most of the implementations these days explicitly come out and stamp a big ACHIEVEMENT UNLOCKED.

    Team Fortress 2 has probably one of the widest-ranging set of achievements out there; everything from “heal a teammate who’s taking fire from 4 enemies at once” to “fire $200,000 worth of minigun rounds in a single life” is potentially under the game’s gaze. It’s not a system for catching all the cool stories - simply about figuring out events that are both awesome and easy to algorithmically extract. Tumblr could do the same, implementing an achievement system that would just slide alongside the existing points system of likes and reblogs, occasionally spicing up your experience with-

    ACHIEVEMENT UNLOCKED: Added 4+ paragraphs onto reblog

  • January 25, 10:25 AM

    I watched Sophia Coppola's Marie Antoinette the other day...

    … and now I understand where Tumblr photoblogs come from: Marie Antoinette seems like the original to which all the Tumblr clichés aspire.

    Seriously, though, it’s a pretty fantastic film. Sophie Coppola’s forte is mood, which she captures in dreamlike music-soaked sequences that refine and amplify Michael Mann’s experimentation in that area. But whereas Michael Mann specializes in urban-montage music videos (which he snuck into Miami Vice in the 80s and just about every movie since), Sophia Coppola does it here using sumptuous production design and a nostalgia-glazed view of nature.

    Nothing really happens, and that’s largely the point. We’re meant to soak up the moment, and disregard what got us there. The second half is weaker mainly because it tries to advance the plot, needing developments to shift the mood and close some of the dangling plot threads. The very final shot rings untrue and it’s much better to end with the penultimate scene: Marie gazing across the estate, living her few days to the fullest, tempered by the realization it cannot possibly last.

  • January 24, 10:46 AM

    Nat'l Book Critics Circle finalists announced

    Amazingly enough after the hubbub about the Publisher’s Weekly top 10 not including any books authored by women, four out of the five fiction nominees are by women authors. There is some overlap with the National Book Award finalists (& winners) already announced.

    The winners will be announced in March, shortly before Pulitzer Prizes - last on the parade of literary awards - are announced sometime in April.

  • January 22, 01:29 PM
    “There is a more serious duty, the duty of listening to our geniuses in a disrespectful manner. Their pride telling them that if time would but stand still they could explain all life, they start on a breakneck journey across the world. They are tormented by the thought of time; they halt by no event, but look down upon it as they pass, cry out their impressions, and gallop on. Often it happens that because of their haste they receive a blurred impression or transmit it to their readers roughly and without precision. And just as it was the duty of the students of Kelvin the mathematician to correct his errors in arithmetic, so it is the duty of critics to rebuke these hastinesses of great writers, lest the blurred impressions weaken the surrounding mental fabric and their rough transmissions frustrate the mission of genius on earth.”
    Rebecca West, pulled by The New Republic’s new Book section from some previous unmentioned date; it still rings true today.
  • January 21, 05:03 PM

    So my Girlfriend got me the Best Christmas Present Ever, and it finally arrived yesterday.

    I read over 200 pages just last night, and am awfully antsy about continuing that spree once I get the chance. There’s something wonderfully vivid about oral testimony, historical or otherwise. :)

  • January 21, 10:33 AM

    This chart from a BibliOdyssey post on Victorian infographics, “Tableau De L’Histoire Universelle depuis la Creation jusqu’a ce jour,” is my favorite infographic ever.

    My 10th grade world history teacher had a reproduction of it on his wall, and it traces the flow of culture through time like a series of intersecting rivers. Alexander the Great appears as a mere canal that intersects them all, while the Roman Empire makes them seem as if mere tributaries (in the river sense, not state).

  • January 20, 01:06 PM

    From last night.

  • January 20, 11:14 AM
    “When we use vague language, it’s easier to get an agreement. When we use very honest, precise language, it’s easier for someone to realize that they disagreed all along.”
    David Sirlin, sneaking in a wonderful tidbit of wisdom while writing about subtractive design and the commonplace resistance to pinning down the essence of a something (e.g. gameplay).
  • January 19, 11:55 PM

    The Hong Kong news CGI re-enactment of the Conan-Leno-NBC tiff that they just showed on The Tonight Show, in its full glory.

  • January 19, 04:40 PM

    The Puppycam has returned!

    The next few months of my life just got a lot more awesome.

  • January 19, 03:44 PM

    The trailer to Christopher Nolan’s Inception features one shot of Paris folding up on itself, producing an effect similar to BERG’s “Here and There” map.

    In the latter case, it’s to be useful as both a street-view-esque navigational aid and as a conventional map; in the former, (presumably) because it looks cool.

  • January 19, 10:56 AM
    “[The Coen Brothers] career-long default mode — half-satirical, half-fabulist — encourages, perhaps demands, a caricaturist’s eye. Nobody but Jim Jarmusch is better at showing the chasm between a character’s puffed-up self-image and the world’s low opinion of him via an unflattering haircut, an unwittingly clichéd item of clothing or an annoying verbal tic (Walter Sobchack hit the trifecta in the Coens’ “Big Lebowski” with his flattop haircut, khaki hunting vest and apropos-of-nothing rants about Vietnam)…

    The filmmakers encourage us to laugh at these poor saps. But they also make the laughs catch in a viewer’s throat by building a detailed social and moral context for all the shenanigans — a context so vast and oppressive, so simultaneously familiar and unnervingly mysterious, that we can (and should) recognize it as a dramatic mirror of our world, however circumscribed or seemingly limitless we consider that world to be. Joel and Ethan Coen have a more precise (and prominent) moral compass — a truly Manichaean sense of right versus wrong — than any comparably prominent mainstream American filmmakers except Steven Spielberg. But unlike Spielberg, the Coens aren’t addicted to happy endings, maybe because they’re more inclined to show life as it is rather than life as they think it should be. They’re fascinated by the shadow that falls between the ideal and the reality, the process by which life as it should be becomes life as it is.

    When you watch a Coens’ film, you’re not seeing reality but its exaggerated and distilled representation, an actual landscape reconfigured as a moral one — a characteristic driven home by such tells as regular cinematographer Roger Deakins’ high-contrast images — gloomy interiors cut by shafts of sunlight, evoking Joseph Conrad’s descriptions of light and shadow as moral signifiers — and Carter Burwell’s mournful and reflective scores, which push against the absurdly stylized violence and slapstick, and contaminate comedy with tragedy.”
    Matt Zoller Seitz, writing on the Coen Brothers as part of his Directors of the Decade series for Salon. Seitz is my favorite writer on films today - even better than the great Roger Ebert - and here he’s nailing why I find the Coen Brothers films absolutely magnetic to watch.
  • January 18, 11:29 AM
    “By his own account, Hörbiger was observing the Moon when he was struck by the notion that the brightness and roughness of its surface was due to ice. Shortly after, he experienced a dream in which he was floating in space watching the swinging of a pendulum which grew longer and longer until it broke. ‘I knew that Newton had been wrong and that the sun’s gravitational pull ceases to exist at three times the distance of Neptune,’ he concluded.”

    (via superhamburgeramerica)

    Wikipedia’s entry on Welteislehre, the “world-ice theory” of Hans Hörbiger, who proposed that the universe was created by the interaction of ice and aether.

    Last evening, researching an imbalance of black bile, I came across Wikipedia’s index of “obsolete scientific theories,” a delightful trove of bizarre and discredited ideas. Glacial cosmology may be the strangest, but there’s something for everyone: rocks from seawater and fire from phlogiston! The tetrahedral and expanding Earth! Luminiferous aether, animal magnetism, and Japhetic theory!

    But take care not to get too excited. Abnormal enthusiasm spreads disease.

    Came across this delightful collection of anecdotes in my bookmarks, and decided it needed better sharing. The Wikipedia category linked above.

  • January 18, 10:16 AM
    “There has been much speculation about the new “Late Night with Conan O’Brien.” Little is known about the new host, and even less about the show’s format. Last week, this writer had the opportunity to watch a test show in Rockefeller Center’s legendary studio 6-A. Frankly, I was not impressed.

    The crowd was visibly eager to like the young newcomer, but some seemed puzzled by the radical new set. The backdrop, consisting of 15-foot representations of Mr. O’Brien’s laughing head, loomed over his desk and chair, both carved from illegally imported African ivory. While this was somewhat unsettling, an aura of eager anticipation still hung in the air.

    Until, that is, the new Late Night band began to play. Composed of musicians cut by the Boston Pops, the band lurched into an interminable version of “Waltzing Matilda,” apparently the show’s theme song. The bandleader, a surly cellist, refused to make eye contact with anyone and hissed at a young girl who tried to clap along. As the music sputtered to a flaccid conclusion, thick jets of foam were dumped on the audience from hidden ceiling ducts. As people wiped the stinging lather from their eyes, Mr. O’Brien jumped out from behind a curtain and cheerfully quipped, “Ha, ha, you’re all foamy!”
    Conan O’Brien, writing a mock review of his then-new show after it debuted to much fanfare and critical fallout.
  • January 17, 10:30 PM

    I spent the afternoon at Great Wolf Lodge, the high temple of childhood wish-fulfillment and wilderness kitsch. Truly unheimlich.

  • January 16, 01:29 PM

    Making models

    bobulate:

    Zinsser on having models:

    We all need models. Bach needed a model; Picasso needed a model. Make a point of reading writers who are doing the kind of writing you want to do. (Many of them write for The New Yorker.) Study their articles clinically. Try to figure out how they put their words and sentences together.

    Study not just others’ writing, but their entire process. How do they write press releases? Ask questions? Draw clearly, not cleanly? Talk about clients? Figuring out models is a process of finessing your own.

    Bobulate is Liz Danzico’s blog. She’s wonderful, her blog is wonderful, and this link is especially wonderful. Click, click, click.

  • January 15, 08:33 PM

    Nakatomi Space - BLDGBLOG

    Geoff Manaugh discusses Die Hard and the “syntax” of urban movement in an incredibly fascinating blog post over at BLDGBLOG. Not mentioned is one videogame that sought to realize the “walking through walls” technique mentioned in the post: Red Faction (and, to some extent, the sequels).

  • January 15, 02:20 PM

    Jimmy Kimmel appeared on Leno last night, and was utterly vicious. So vicious, in fact, that NBC/Hulu only excerpted the first minute for a promo clip so I had to make a custom clip to show the whole mini-interview.

    If you have a free hour of time, the Jimmy Kimmel Live episode from Tuesday on Hulu is well worth it. Kimmel does the entire episode in-character as Leno, complete with his band leader imitating Kevin Eubanks (with a little bit of Shaffer too). At first it’s just a hilarious novelty, but about 5-7 minutes in the Kimmel (as Leno) and Cleto (as Eubanks) banter just about takes over.

  • January 14, 06:48 PM

    Newspapers used to be a little bit more fanciful in their reporting.

    (via Paleofuture and BLDGBLOG)

  • January 14, 04:03 PM

    Two of my kids found matching Cherry Kool-Aid outfits (somewhere in Ohio?!) and are now wandering around the building claiming to be the “Red Hoods” gang. Coincidentally, they are the two least likely to excel in an actual gang.

  • January 13, 11:39 PM
    “Hosting The Tonight Show has been the dream of a lifetime, and I have something to tell all the kids out there: you can do anything you want… unless Jay Leno wants to do it too.”
    Conan O’Brien, just now.
  • January 13, 11:24 AM
    “Apple says that it likes having the cash on hand because it gives the company strategic flexibility when it comes to investments and acquisitions. That makes sense. But I think there’s another good reason for Apple to be cash-rich: it allows the company to continue to play the long game, rather than worrying overmuch about quarterly cashflow. To give just one example, Apple spent five years, from 2000 to 2005, writing and developing a version of its operating system, OS X, which would work on Intel chips. It didn’t do that because it wanted or expected to move to an Intel-based architecture, but it felt that the option value was worth it. And then, after five years of capital expenditure with no expectation of any return on that investment, it decided to exercise the option.”

    Felix Salmon’s analysis of why Apple keeps so much cash on hand, even in the face of demands to invest it or otherwise distribute the money as dividends to shareholders.

    I’m beginning to feel the pull of management theory as a future area of interest for me, largely out of dissatisfaction with the lay understanding I’ve seen promulgated through media and otherwise. Most of the theory I’ve seen so far seems to fall on two sides of a divide: either too vague/meaningless to be applicable, or so specific that it’s outright refuted by the brute facts of reality.

    After thinking about it for a few days, it also seems like the slap-myself-in-the-head-obvious extension to some of my earlier interests: in institutions and the way they perpetuate themselves, the way that power is gained and held within institutions, and how social movements can work within and without institutions to effect change. There’s also a more explicit connection to my interest in “managerial liberalism” - the ideology-disclaiming-ideology at times occupied by JFK, LBJ, and arguably Obama that I’ll probably talk more about soonish.

    Any good resources out there to learn the kind of stuff I’m looking for? To give an example, the above-linked Felix Salmon blog is one of the best resources I’ve found yet: full of practical reasoning, informed analysis of the particulars of each case, and a focus on animating principles rather than outright rules or decision-trees. Rands is another good take, combining compelling stories with genuine insights as to his management ideas. And Atul Gawande’s Better is… well… the best!

    Oddly enough, a lot of the most effective writing in this vein doesn’t really market itself as management theory. Instead, the advice is implied by a much more specific analysis of the case in question. The author only spells their heuristic out at the end, attaching the appropriate amount of hesitation and self-doubt.

    Any suggestions on reading material would be greatly appreciated, and can be sent through my Ask page in the appropriate Jeopardy format (or through Disqus comments to this post).

  • January 12, 03:19 PM

    Have I mentioned lately how awesome Richard Feynman is? Here he is trying to explain the process of whys.

  • January 12, 03:04 PM

    Owen Pallett - Keep the Dog Quiet

    Off his new Heartland LP, this marks the first album Owen Pallett has released under his own name. His previous moniker was “Final Fantasy” - a tribute to the video game series that had the unfortunate side-effect of making him hellish to google for.

    In addition to his solo stuff, Pallett has a healthy number of side gigs arranging the strings for Arcade Fire, Grizzly Bear, The Mountain Goats, and more. When he goes on tour by himself, though, he still manages to sound like multiple players thanks to the same clever looping technique as Andrew Bird (as seen in this wry cover of a Mariah Carey song).

    The downside to posting a song from this album is that starting with the third one, they all tend to flow into each other in a way hard to get from any one excerpt. So here’s the second song, which is pretty self-contained and fairly traditional to Owen Pallett’s previous work. The rest is more out there and awesomer!

  • January 11, 08:44 PM

    My malady.

  • January 11, 12:27 PM

    Say what you will about our school cafeteria, but it gives us gorgeous views of sunsets over a frozen lake.

Upgrade Flash to view this site properly