Where did this year go?
I can't believe it's time ALREADY.
We make sure to safeguard our users' private Journal entries but also provide tools that allow them to choose with whom to share the content they want to share, be it with just a small group of friends, or with a larger user-created community. We respect the decisions our users make, and let them decide how to protect the content they create. We continue to maintain the service that the LiveJournal community trusts.
Sometimes, LJ, I honestly wonder if you've learned anything over the years.
I completely understand wanting to add an extra level of functionality to your users' experience. I can see how you're trying to compete with other blogging platforms by including the ability to cross-post to Twitter and FB. It makes sense on the surface, but you're forgetting about the reasons why people choose LJ in the first place.
This decision to allow all comments to be cross-posted regardless of security level is going to jeopardize the perception of privacy that many users stay with LJ specifically for. Yes, you can argue that comments belong to the comment author and not the original poster, but that's missing the point. If you're locking a post, logically you're doing it so the internet at large doesn't know what it's about. Comments to posts generally refer to what the post is about, thereby completely obliterating any perception of privacy.
Seriously, what the hell were you thinking? All this accomplishes for me is making me wonder why I'm using LJ at all, and I don't even lock that many posts.
Allow users to opt out entire journals or do away with this feature.
Oh, and the new remixed header for September is painfully bad. If we're going to get bad photoshop circa 1998, I would much rather go back to the standard header.
Comment with a number between 1 and 9443, and I will give you a random song from my playlist. Probably the coolest song in the immediate vicinity. It's only for preview purposes, you're supposed to delete within 24 hours, not my responsibility if you don't, blah blah. Open through…let's say 2 AM Eastern.
Your result for The 3 Variable Funny Test...
What we ask is that authors utilize the nature of fanfic to its full potential, by opening themselves to criticism of the isms they probably aren't even aware of in their story, to absorb what fandom is trying to share with them when it criticizes these things, to fucking grow as people and allow their writing to grow with them. We don't want fandom to go silent: we want to shape in it a voice that actually pushes boundaries, that actually transforms fannish space from one of privilege to one of inclusion and respect for all fen, one that questions openly the people whose writing tries to reinforce the same status quo authors of classic literature questioned with their published works.
It's hard to decide if there's a point of most importance, but I think this is it:
Privileged people must learn to be uncomfortable, or no one will get anywhere.
Being comfortable usually means you're riding on privilege. The dominant paradigm's made things easy for you, and you're milking that for all that it's worth, at the expense of other people.
It sucks to have unconscious assumptions and prejudices pointed out. It really really does. It isn't any fun at all. IMO it sucks mostly because when it happens we are forced to face the fact that we haven't confronted our own unconscious assumptions and prejudices. It sucks because we like to think we are nice, open-minded people and sometimes our unconscious assumptions and prejudices aren't nice, open-minded, or pretty. It sucks and it makes us defensive and angry and sad.
However, having the issue pointed out didn't create the problem. The person pointing out the issue isn't inserting that issue into our psychology, it was already there. If you have lettuce in your teeth and the person across the table points it out, it is not the person across the table's fault that the lettuce is there.
I personally don't believe in silencing anyone. Seriously, you go right ahead and write whatever you damn well want to. As a believer in free speech, I'm all for you following your artistic vision.
Of course as a believer in free speech I'm also all for calling you out if your artistic vision reflects, for example, the racism prevalent in society today. Because here's the thing, "I was just following my artistic vision!" is not a get out of jail free card. Neither is "I'm exercising my right to free speech!" Free speech is a two way street, people, and artistic vision doesn't shield you from people telling you that your end result is, (again, an example) racist.
High Fidelity!
formerly-waycider -et al→ briseis
formerly-waycider:parrotworm:ilovetheoc:
Ryan: Why can’t we just go to Comic-Con?
Seth: Okay, Comic-Con is just a bunch of pathetic virgins ogling some porn star dressed as Cat Woman.
Ryan: I thought you went every year.The OC, 1x07 “The Escape”
This is an excerpt from my new coffee table book, “Like It Was Yesterday”, which will be released this fall. The book is being printed in an exclusive edition of 500 signed and number copies. I will keep you posted!
Duran at the Riot House
1981: I was a really big Duran Duran fan. Everything about the band was so cool. I read about them in the European press and of course, I had heard their records all over the radio. A couple of days before their debut showcase at the Roxy, I called up their road manager at the Hyatt House (we used to call it the Riot House) and asked for a photo session. I could have told him I was shooting for Music Life and Rock Show, which were amazing magazines in Japan regularly publishing my work. The band had nothing better to do, so it was arranged and I met them at the hotel pool.
They did not have a clue about getting around in Los Angeles; so, I piled them into my old Mercedes and gave them a tour of the Sunset Strip. The photo session was amazing and John Taylor made sure that I was on the guest list for the gig that evening. The following year, Andy Taylor got married at the Chateau Marmont Hotel and I just kind of showed up with some friends and joined the bash. Camera in hand, of course.
This has long been one of my favorite celebrity photos, which is really saying something. Much love, Brad. <3
jooleah -et al→ madeofgold:
Bradley: If our names were actually representational of who we are, I’d be called “Angel” and she’d be called…
Angel: What would I be called?
Bradley: HUSSY.
— S1 cast diaries
fuckyeahsomerhalder -et al→ elena-salvatore:
Ian Somerhalder | Comic Con 2010
remnantof:absolutegeology:llbwwb:
Grand Prismatic Springs in Yellowstone Park by Reed Miller.
Endless
by Clark Little
Looking Glass
by Clark Little
brokenblossoms -et al→ amusemi
thereisnomorocco -et al→ jesusplayingolf
David Tennant
Oh, Tennant. He of the crazy expressions and manic performances. I hated him so much in Goblet of Fire that it’s amazing how much I love him in Doctor Who. In fact, I wasn’t looking forward to seeing him as The Doctor because I hated him so much. Thankfully, he changed my mind because I really love his face.
It’s entirely possible I’m the only person who loved Barty Jr. in GoF. The only thing I didn’t like was the tongue thing, which I assumed was direction rather than DT, for the sake of continuity.
Which is to say, I think I might steal this 100 Beautiful People idea. :D
It’s about time that everyone learned their damn homophones. If you slept your way through the fourth grade or just skipped all of the grammar lectures because you were too busy sucking off that dude in the locker room, then maybe this table will help clear up some of the fucking confusion.
attackedastoria -et al→ theanimalblog
HATERS GONNA HATE
truffle-shuffle -et al→ spoonyriffic:
“Wait till you read Book 7. Oh… I cried.”
Doctor Who/Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows
I'm all over the internet. It can be confusing, I know. This page puts the big stuff all in one handy place. Expand a section to read the content, click on the linked titles or dates within to visit the actual site/full entry it's from. It's Anita: Quick and dirty style.