I give leadership and direction to SLN online faculty development and instructional design.
Advisory Board Member for 2013-2015
http://campustechnology.com/articles/2013/03/11/press-release_new-advisory-board-members.aspx
Program Track Chair:
Student Support Services 2012
Faculty Support 2013
The Sloan Consortium Blended Learning Conference and Workshop provides the opportunity for attendees to engage with one another throughout this conference sharing information and ideas.
Program Track Chair:
Faculty and Professional Development 2005-2011
Student Sevices and Learner Support 2012
Technology and Emerging Learning Environments 2013
Responsibilities
Publications - Design and publication of monthly newsletter, quarterly journal, financial quarterly, periodic legislative bulletin, annual report, annual calendar, brochures, and additional materials. Activities included graphic design and illustration; planning; layout; systematic gathering of information; writing; editing; supervision of outside authors and designers; and coordination with printer, mailing company, and post office. Responsible for a print production budget of +$250K.
Public Relations - Organization and implementation of a PR program. Activities also include writing press releases, researching, co-authoring and editing grants, speeches, coordination of press conferences, creating and maintaining a network of media connections, and collecting newsworthy events. Coordinating TV, radio, and print media opportunities for marketing SAANYS events, issues, membership, etc.
Director of Materials Production
The MEDEX Group, John A. Burns School of Medicine,
University of Hawaii at Manoa, Honolulu, Hawaii (RCUH)
Responsibilities
In-house desktop publishing and production of training materials and manuals. Project management, editing, instructional/graphic design, and coordination of international authors. Collaboration with outside editors, artists, and designers. Supervision and training of an international materials production team.
Oversaw the production of:
- the national undergraduate Nursing curriculum for the Country of Kenya.
- the pre-service nursing training program for the country of Colombia, SA.
- an in-service primary health care curriculum for the department of Social Security for the country of Costa Rica, CA.
-Facilitator-led and stand-alone PHC training programs, materials, etc, for programs in Thailand, China, Papua New Guinea, Botswana, Lesotho, Malawi, India.
my course code changed and so i have moved this blog http://etap687.edublogs.org/ to http://etap640.edublogs.org where i will continue to “share what i know” : )
I have had the opportunity to with thousands of online faculty and to observe hundreds of thousands of online students in the SUNY Learning Network (SLN). From that vantage point I can sense/feel the increased interest in and usage of audio and video-enhanced online instruction/communications/interaction. And at work I feel it too. Skype and elluminate meetings, workgroups, and collaborations are a regular thing now. I see a definite trend away from purely text-based interaction in the world of online teaching and learning from both faculty and students. And though that certainly does not mean that text-based communications will disappear, there is something about audio and video communications in instruction that significantly enhances the experience for faculty and students in terms of creating more engaging content presentation, and enhancing interaction, collaboration, and feedback. (My friend Phil Ice has done some research on this. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.137.2582&rep=rep1&type=pdf). In my efforts to explore what it really means to be learner-centered as an online educator in my own online instruction, I have come to the conclusion to really do that, I have to let go and let students be engaged and express that in ways that are meaningful to them and their lives. This is not as easy …or comfortable as it sounds. I would probably be characterized as one of the most learner-centered online instructor by friends and colleagues …and yet I struggle – so I know how hard it is.
I also feel that an LMS that locks down and controls access and ownership of student content is problematic and contributes to my frustration and struggle. I mean if we are asking them to generate content, then why does their access to their content go away at the end of the term? How can you call a tool a blog if they don’t own it, can’t personalize it, it is NOT public AND it (and their content) gets taken away at the end of the term – and so on… This tension I feel between the LMS and student-created content is one of the main reasons I teach mostly “outside the box” and have been presenting everywhere I can about teaching and learning in the cloud: http://prezi.com/yyzcr9_btox6/teaching-learning-in-the-cloud/
I always tell the faculty I work with NOT to get attached to “tools” as they change, get bought and killed, or just disappear… I tell them to be fearless and that there are tons of tools, so that if one goes away there are others to take its place http://www.appappeal.com/web-2-0-application-world-mosaic/ I tell them that you need to start with a learning objective, NOT the tool, and you just need criteria to evaluate tools – Does it help you achieve your learning objective “better, faster, safer, easier, or cheaper?”
When evaluating technology for instructional purposes I see 3 main areas that have the potential to be enhanced in some way via the use of some technology.
Those areas are (1) content presentation,(2) interaction/collaboration, and (3) feedback.
I also always always always start from pedagogy, not the technology, or the technology solution. It is not about using technology for technology sake. It is technology in the service of pedagogy, not the other way around.
So, you have to start with a specific learning objective.
Then, consider: Does a tool or approach assist me to…? :
Then, I apply my criteria: will this technical solution assist me to achieve my targeted learning objective “better, faster safer, easier, or cheaper” in one of those 3 areas listed above.
If so, then there is solid rationale to explore the use of the tool or approach or solution for instructional purposes.
It is about enhancing learning for the student- making it more engaging and/or effective, and it is about making me, the instructor, more effective and/or engaging – this can include making me more efficient, so that I have time to spend more time interacting with students, diagnosing misperceptions, providing feedback, modeling behaviors…etc.
Here is my “Top 10″ list for 2011:
did not quite make the list, but still very cool:
I just learned yesterday that my favorite asynchronous video conversation/discussion tool http://seesmic.tv is being shut down on December 1. (tomorrow) i am devastated by this news.
I know I am being hypocritical lamenting the loss of this tool…I always tell the faculty I work with NOT to get attached to “tools” as they change, get bought and killed, or just disappear… I tell them to be fearless and that there are tons of tools, so that if one goes away, there are others to take its place http://www.appappeal.com/web-2-0-application-world-mosaic/ I tell them that you need to start with a learning objective, NOT the tool, and you just need criteria to evaluate tools – Does it help you achieve your learning objective “better, faster, safer, easier, or cheaper?”
So, I made the mistake of getting attached to this tool… I LOVE http://seesmic.tv/alexandrapickett for many reasons and am very sad that it is going away. It is the only tool I know of of its kind and would really appreciate any suggestions for alternatives.
I love it
I <heart> seesmic and am not ready to let it go. This tool has so much potential for online teaching and learning.
I wish there was a way for small tools like this to be saved from extinction for use in education.
Associate Director . SUNY Learning Network . State University Plaza . Albany, NY 12246 . T: 1.518.320.1393 F: 1.518.320.1554
alexandra.pickett@suny.edu . http://sln.suny.edu . http://slnfacultyonline.ning.com/ . http://slneducation.edublogs.org/
http://slideshare.net/alexandrapickett . http://prezi.com/yyzcr9_btox6/ . http://voicethread.com/share/524903/
Examples from my online course
Join my networks!
JOIN !! – http://slnfacultyonline.ning.com/?xgi=2Gz3g5qukBqMim
1. http://www.twitter.com/alexpickett
2. http://www.slideshare.net/alexandrapickett/slideshows
3. http://www.youtube.com/user/alexandrapickett
4. http://video.seesmic.com/alexandrapickett
5. http://www.diigo.com/profile/alexandrapickett & http://del.icio.us/alexandrapickett/
6. http://www.screencast.com/users/alexandrapickett
7. http://twitter.com/slnsolsummit & http://slnsolsummit2009.edublogs.org/
8. http://flickr.com/photos/alexandrapickett
9. http://friendfeed.com/alexandrapickett & http://facebook.com/alexandrapickett
10. http://www.linkedin.com/in/alexandrapickett
11. Alejandra Subagja in Second Life: http://slurl.com/secondlife/SUNY%20Learning%20Network/128/128/0
12. Skype: alexandrapickett
Cooltools
Videos
Blogs
1. http://etap687.edublogs.org – my personal blog/course blog.
2. http://slneducation.edublogs.org/ – my work blog.
To contribute to this conversation:
Hi there!
Here you will find the feedback on the module 3 learning activities assignment. I recommend that listen to each others feedback.
Below you will find a playlist of podcasted feedback for your Module 3 learning activities assignment. Scroll the playlist to find your name, select it, and it will auto launch the podcast for you to listen to your feedback.
You can also access your feedback via a playlist found here:
I just took this really cool quiz in FB to determine how polychronic http://apps.facebook.com/how-adaptable-bedcic/?start=1&target=home
apparently, i am highly polychronic!
You multi-dimensionally approach work projects with flexible, adjustable plans and shared responsibilities. You tend to believe the success of business transactions is ultimately determined by the individuals involved and their cohesiveness as a team. Work is founded upon quality interpersonal interaction and long-term investment in community, which takes precedence over all forms of activity. Communication tends to be spontaneous and high context. Decision making is based on extensive group involvement, discussion, and consensus. The essence of leadership is the subtle balance of group consensus and personal vision.